Just a few days ago, President Joe Biden stood in front of the American people and pleaded about the importance of banning certain assault rifles from being purchased. He discussed how citizens would need more than guns to overthrow a government, explained how an AR-15 is not for hunting, and how the bullets from one of these weapons shred the body. With each different example, the descriptions got darker until he started yelling angrily about banning assault rifles. Cheers followed each remark from Biden as a crowd of supporters surrounded him. But while the President begged for people to vote Democrat and called the GOP supporters of Donald Trump, it seems that even judges appointed by Biden aren’t sold on his idea of a gun-free America.

Just a refresher for those who happened to miss President Joe Biden’s comments on keeping America safe, in the video below, he admitted that for a group of people to overthrow the government, they needed more than AR-15s. Take a look. 

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

In Colorado, U.S. District Judge Charlotte Sweeney, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, placed a temporary restraint on Boulder County. The county enforced a jurisdictional ban on the selling of most assault rifles like the AR-15. The county also banned the sale of any magazine that can hold more than ten rounds.

Using the U.S. Supreme Court in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen ruling as an example, Judge Sweeney wrote in a statement, “On this admittedly limited record and with a liberal analysis of this factor, the Court finds that Plaintiffs establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.” 

On top of Sweeney’s decision, the Rocky Mountain Gun Owners (RMGO) and places like Boulder, Superior, and Louisville all decided to cancel the ban. The joint motion stated, “Further, counsel for Louisville, the City of Boulder, and Boulder County have represented that, in the event that consolidation is granted, they will agree to stay in enforcement of their respective assault weapon and LCM bans pending resolution of the preliminary injunction motions, thereby negating both the need for any additional briefing on the TRO motions and for any additional judicial resources to be spent on that is e. Consolidation would avoid the inherent risk of inconsistent judgments that would be raised by the separate treatment of four nearly identical cases in the same federal district court.” 

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

Besides Colorado, New York is also under criticism for its concealed carry laws being in direct conflict with the Second Amendment. With the new gun laws already being contested, attorney Jonathan Corbett, a concealed carry applicant, told The Associated Press, “They seem to be designed less towards addressing gun violence and more towards simply preventing people from getting guns — even if those people are law-abiding, upstanding citizens, who according to the Supreme Court have the rights to have them.”

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of DrewBerquist.com. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.