You might want to buckle up for this next one as it seems a popular transgender activist took it upon herself to claim that children should be ordered to be put on puberty blockers before they can decide for themselves which sex they want to be. Don’t worry about the numerous side effects or health concerns, all that matters to this popular Youtuber is that kids as young as eleven be forced on harmful pills so they can play God.

Going by the name her followers gave her, Zinnia Jones, AKA Lauren McNamara, drew her line in the sand earlier this month when she decided to tweet a series of messages demanding children be put on puberty blockers until they are old enough to decide.

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

Her tweet reads, “If children can’t consent to puberty blockers which pause any permanent changes even with the relevant professional evaluation, how can they consent to the permanent and irreversible changes that come with their own puberty with no professional evaluation whatsoever?”

The adoptive mother of two didn’t stop there with her outrageous banter. She also believes, “an inability to offer informed consent or understand the long-term consequences is actually an argument for putting every single cis and trans person on puberty blockers until they acquire that ability.”

So, what McNamara wants is essentially to play creator. By not allowing children to grow and nature to take its proper course, we could catapult children into a world of gender dysphoria. What is that exactly? That is where a person that has gone under reassignment surgery has regrated the decision.

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

Most people who switch genders claim that they believed the change would cure their dysphoria, but unfortunately for some – it made it worse and the change was hard to reverse. Still, McNamara’s argument comes on the heels of a popular court case in the U.K. where Keira Bell sued a youth clinic for not challenging her more on the decision to transition.

The courts ultimately ruled against Bell saying, “it is doubtful that a child aged 14 or 15 could understand and weigh the long-term risks and consequences of the administration of puberty blockers.” Still, “in respect of young persons aged 16 and over, the legal position is that there is a presumption that they have the ability to consent to medical treatment.”