A Black Lives Matter thug said what others only suspected, that the Christmas parade massacre was a direct and intentional radical response to the Rittenhouse verdict. We said this from the beginning.

Are we really surprised? Does it take a giant leap of faith to think a terrorist organization like BLM would terrorize? What are the chances that a group that has looted, burned, and killed would kill again after a court verdict they disliked? They are very good.

Backed by Soros money, egged on by the likes of MSNBC, conditioned by pop culture and academia, BLM and similar groups are taking advantage of their friends in the White House and Congress to indulge in an orgy of wanton violence. It won’t stop until the vast majority of the country shows the courage of the Rittenhouse jury.

FNC: “A Milwaukee Black Lives Matter activist said the Christmas parade attack in Waukesha, Wisconsin, appears to signal ‘the revolution’ may have begun.

Police have not released a motive behind the attack on Sunday night, which left five dead and 48 others injured after a car drove through a Christmas parade. No connection has been found between the attack and the not guilty verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. Authorities arrested Darrell Brooks Jr. and charged him with five counts of first-degree intentional homicide.”

“I don’t know. Now we’ll have to wait and see because they do have somebody in custody. We may have to wait and see what they say about why this happened,” Vaun Mayes said on Facebook Live on Monday. “But it sounds possible that the revolution has started in Wisconsin. It started with this Christmas parade.”

Do you support individual military members being able to opt out of getting the COVID vaccine?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from DrewBerquist.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

“I said I wasn’t going to speak on no rumors. Y’all are repeating some of the stuff that, you know, that has come up. And I can tell you that the initial person who reached out to me said that they believe that this has to do with the verdict, and so I made an assumption of which side it would be from, but I don’t know,” he said referring to the not-guilty verdict of Kyle Rittenhouse. Give him points for candor.